WebThis paper axiomatizes a form of recursive utility on consumption processes that permits a role for ambiguity as well as risk. The model has two prominent special cases: (i) the recursive model of risk preference due to Kreps and Porteus [18]; and (ii) an intertemporal version of multiple-priors utility due to Epstein and Schneider [8]. The generalization … WebAug 28, 2024 · Our analysis adopts recursive intertemporal preferences for decision makers that allow them to be ambiguity averse and concerned about the potential …
RECURSIVE AMBIGUITY AND MACHINA'S EXAMPLES
WebSuch behavior is inconsistent with subjective expected utility theory (SEU), ... 2.2.1 Recursive Utility 2.2.2 Updating and Learning 3. Ambiguity in Financial Markets ... multiplier utility and of the smooth ambiguity model are identical to those of SEU. In all three models, with standard speci fications, agents are locally risk neutral, ... WebNov 1, 2008 · Epstein and Schneider (2003) provide an axiomatically well-founded model of intertemporal utility that accommodates Knightian ambiguity aversion in discrete time. Because intertemporal utility is also recursive, they refer to it as recursive multiple-priors utility (RMPU). Chen and Epstein (2002) formulate a continuous-time counterpart of RMPU. hunter boots youth canada
Ambiguity and the value of information - JSTOR
WebIn order to accommodate a concern with ambiguity, we model agents as having recursive multiple-priors utility. This model of utility is a multi-period extension of Gilboa and Schmeidler (1989) whereby the single probability measure of the standard Savage model is replaced by a set of probabilities or priors. Chen and Epstein (2002) WebMar 1, 2024 · A recursive representation (for ≿) refers to a utility function over F ∪ Δ (X) defined by a μ ∈ Δ 2 (S) and a certainty equivalence function c on Δ (X) such that c (μ f) and c (p) give the utility of any f ∈ F and p ∈ Δ (X), respectively. A recursive preference is … Weba number of situations where Choquet expected utility, as well as other known models of ambiguity aversion, cannot capture plausible features of ambiguity attitudes. Most of these problems arise in choice over prospects involving three or more outcomes. We show that the recursive nonexpected utility model of Segal (International Economic Review 28 marty\u0027s cycle morristown